Self-check · Five questions
Fraud maturity quiz
Five questions about how your team makes and checks fraud decisions. You get one of three results, with where to look first.
Result
Gaps are likely at launch.
Much of your fraud work is probably reactive. That is common at a fast-growing company, and it is where a new product gets hurt: the flow goes live, and the first time anyone looks at abuse is after the money has left. Start by writing down, for the next launch, how it could be abused and who signs off before it ships.
Where to look first:
Result
A base is in place, with uneven coverage.
Some parts of your process are solid and some depend on who is available. The risk sits in the uneven parts: a new rail or a rule change that skips the checks the rest of your work gets. Make the review before launch and the test on past traffic the same steps every time.
Where to look first:
Result
The basics are covered.
Your process has an owner, a review before launch, tests on past traffic and readable reasons. What an inside team rarely has is an outside view of a flow it built itself. This is a self-check, not an audit, and an independent attack tree of your next launch is the natural next step.
Where to look first:
Your answers stay in this browser. Nothing is sent or stored.
Want the outside view of your next launch?
A Launch Fraud Review is a private attack tree of your new flow. Free, in writing. Runs beside your current system. Nothing to rip out.